Presented at 4:00pm in Cotton Creek II on Thursday, November 15, 2018.
#17242Speaker(s)
- Naveesha Maharaj
Session Details
- Length of Session: 1-hr
- Format: Lecture
- Expertise Level: Beginner
- Type of session: General Conference
Summary
Violation of standards or a best practice? As much as we all want an exceptional web experience for our users, we don’t have the resources to follow every best practice while also ensuring that our process is efficient and effective. Let’s focus on clarifying some of the most confusing, debated and misinterpreted areas in the realm of accessibility requirements and best practices.
Abstract
Although WCAG 2.0 has many well-defined checkpoints, we still wind up asking ourselves “Is this a fail, and if it is a fail, what Service Criterion does this fail under, and at what level? Do we follow the letter of the law, or do we lean toward the spirit of the law and loosen up our interpretations as we learn to apply accessibility guidelines to new and evolving technologies? In this session, lets discuss grey areas and why some issues are considered best practice and what potentially makes others a failure. We need to be clear about what is a ‘Nice to have’ vs ‘What you MUST have’. Confusion on how to best interpret and enforce the guidelines can lead to create big problems with company budgets and project timelines, so we need to be as clear as possible on which issues are accessibility best practices and which issues are accessibility violations and remediate as needed
Keypoints
- The perfect measurement of instructions and feedback on user input and how to be predictable
- Understanding the purpose of criteria to push all the right buttons
- Sometimes design speaks louder than words and then there is overkill
Disability Areas
All Areas
Topic Areas
Alternate Format, Legal, Uncategorized
Speaker Bio(s)
Naveesha Maharaj
Handout(s)
- Many Shades of Gray_AHG2018
A presentation where all the grey areas of WCAG are revealed and resolved