Presented at 9:15am in Penrose 1 on Friday, November 18, 2022.#36564
- Crista Earl, Principal Accessibility Consultant, Tech for All
- Charles Linsmeier, Executive Vice President & General Manager, Macmillan Learning
- Length of Session: 1-hr
- Format: Lecture
- Expertise Level: Beginner
- Type of session: General Conference
We know the basics of accessibility etiquette (don’t pet a working dog, don’t grab the arm of a person who is blind) but what happens when best intentions get in the way of best practices. We will explore some common pitfalls encountered by accessibility entities: excellent accessibility solutions with poor implementation, addressing accessibility as a ‘feature’, and wearing disability as a costume. We will also dig into practices with mixed outcomes such as long self description by presenters.
Our discussion begins with what we understand to be well-known accessibility etiquette for practitioners in the field, although we acknowledge that there is still significant education necessary outside of accessibility practitioners. When it comes to physical space or personal space, we have a good idea of what the best practices are and where good intentions can be problems for people with disabilities.
Digital spaces, presentations, and verbal interactions come with many more vagaries. Rather than discourage good intentions with bad results, we should harness the desire to help and make sure we are educating our peers about best practices.
We plan to discuss common pitfalls including the pros and cons of self description in presentation. This growing trend is meant to be more inclusive but the question remains as to whether it levels a playing field or just introduces needless information. Included in this discussion will be when it’s appropriate to identify gender, ethnicity, and other identifying features and how to avoid establishing any particular identifier as a baseline (ie Doctor and Female Doctor).
Companies embracing inclusion often want to demonstrate this with the imagery that they use. Marketing material now has a more diverse set which includes people with disabilities… but does it? Often these are images of people dressing up as disabled by hopping in a wheelchair or grabbing a cane and sunglasses. We will discuss where to find images of people who have disabilities and some search tips for testing the images you’re currently using.
Finally, we’ll take a look at big improvements that lack a complete implementation. In physical spaces, this is the printed sign advertising braille menus and the sign on the elevator to ask for access… up a flight of stairs. In the digital space, accessibility window dressing is increasingly common from web pages touting product accessibility that are merely images of text with no alt text to “If you need accessibility help, contact us” links that lead to inaccessible forms. This discussion will include half implemented features such as videos with audio descriptions that don’t include that description in the transcript.
There are ways we can pull our colleagues and ourselves back from falling into the pit of good intentions. Let’s talk about what methods are working and how we can make them widespread.
Involve people with disabilities in all steps of solutioning
Consider HOW something is being used, not just what has to be done
Be open to criticism - be constructive in giving criticism
Stop firefighting, start planning
Don’t make roles in name only - make sure your team has expertise
Consider accessibility throughout your process, not just at the end
- Attendees will learn to recognize accessibility pitfalls: good intentions are getting in the way of doing good
- Learn techniques and practices for addressing the pitfalls.
- Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good: we can harness the power of wanting to do good to make a difference.
Accessible Educational Materials, Administrative/Campus Policy, Faculty Development & Support, Teaching about Accessibility in Curriculum, Uncategorized
Crista has 30-plus years of experience in design, development, and testing of accessible information and communication technology. Previously as Director of Web Operations at the American Foundation for the Blind, she oversaw a team of developers, database administrators, content managers, and social media professionals to develop and expand several accessible websites and software applications. With CrissCross Technologies, she created and distributed audio tutorials on Windows-based applications for users of screen-reading technology and developed and distributed games and educational software for people with visual impairments. As a senior member of the TFA consulting team she leads non-visual accessibility evaluation of software, website, mobile, and integrated hardware & software products. As an instructor at the Baruch College Computer Center for Visually Impaired People, she taught several courses.
Charles Linsmeier is Executive Vice President & General Manager at Macmillan Learning, serving as head of editorial strategy and publishing processes for the higher education, high school, and enterprise markets. He earned his undergraduate degree from the University of New Mexico and completed his master’s degree in political science at the City University of New York. He joined Macmillan in 2000. He has worked on various educational technology products, most recently Macmillan Learning’s Achieve and iClicker learning and engagement platforms, involving initiatives focused on assessment, economic and science literacy, and evidence-based learning. Recently, he began service as co-chair of the DEI executive council at Macmillan Learning, which provides access to teams and initiatives exploring equitable learning opportunities for all students.